CrowdStrike and Zscaler Take a Dive as AI Tool Raises Concerns for Cybersecurity Stocks.
Written by Emily J. Thompson, Senior Investment Analyst
Updated: Feb 23 2026
0mins
Should l Buy JPM?
Source: Barron's
- Market Reaction: Cybersecurity stocks, including CrowdStrike Holdings and Zscaler, experienced a significant drop on Monday.
- New AI Tool: The decline followed the announcement by Anthropic of a new security tool integrated into its AI model, Claude.
Trade with 70% Backtested Accuracy
Stop guessing "Should I Buy JPM?" and start using high-conviction signals backed by rigorous historical data.
Sign up today to access powerful investing tools and make smarter, data-driven decisions.
Analyst Views on JPM
Wall Street analysts forecast JPM stock price to rise
19 Analyst Rating
11 Buy
7 Hold
1 Sell
Moderate Buy
Current: 300.260
Low
260.00
Averages
341.38
High
400.00
Current: 300.260
Low
260.00
Averages
341.38
High
400.00
About JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co. is a financial holding company. The Company is engaged in investment banking, financial services for consumers and small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. The Company operates through three segments: Consumer & Community Banking (CCB), Commercial & Investment Bank (CIB), and Asset & Wealth Management (AWM). Its CCB segment offers products and services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, digital and telephone banking. Its CIB segment consists of banking and payments and markets and securities services, and offers a suite of investment banking, lending, payments, market-making, financing, custody and securities products and services to a global base of corporate and institutional clients. AWM segment offers investment and wealth management solutions. It offers multi-asset investment management solutions, retirement products and services, brokerage, custody, estate planning, and others.
About the author
Emily J. Thompson
Emily J. Thompson, a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) with 12 years in investment research, graduated with honors from the Wharton School. Specializing in industrial and technology stocks, she provides in-depth analysis for Intellectia’s earnings and market brief reports.
Comparison Analysis of iShares Bond ETFs
- Cost and Yield Comparison: The iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a slightly lower expense ratio of 0.14% compared to the iShares 20-Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 0.15%, while offering a dividend yield of 4.44%, which is marginally higher than TLT's 4.27%, making LQD more attractive for income-focused investors.
- Risk and Return Analysis: Over the past five years, LQD's maximum drawdown was 24.9%, significantly lower than TLT's 48.3%, indicating that LQD has demonstrated greater resilience during market volatility, appealing to investors seeking lower credit risk.
- Portfolio Composition: LQD holds over 3,071 securities, primarily concentrated in well-known issuers like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, ensuring diversity and stability in its portfolio, whereas TLT holds only 46 long-dated Treasury bonds, virtually eliminating credit risk.
- Interest Rate Sensitivity Consideration: Although LQD has outperformed TLT in the past five years, TLT's long-duration bond portfolio may perform better if interest rates decline, prompting investors to weigh LQD's higher yield against TLT's interest rate sensitivity to select the investment strategy that best fits their risk tolerance.
See More
Comparative Analysis of LQD and TLT Investments
- Cost and Yield Comparison: LQD charges a slightly lower annual expense ratio of 4.4% compared to TLT's 4.3%, while also offering a marginally higher yield, making it more appealing for income-focused investors despite the small difference.
- Portfolio Composition: LQD holds over 3,071 investment-grade corporate bonds, including major issuers like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs, whereas TLT only contains 46 long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, providing LQD with a diversification advantage in risk management.
- Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis: With an effective portfolio duration of 15.6 years, TLT is highly sensitive to interest rate changes, while LQD's average duration is just under 8 years, indicating lower volatility in rising rate environments.
- Market Performance and Risk Assessment: Although LQD has outperformed TLT over the past five years, TLT's long-duration bond portfolio could yield better results if interest rates decline, prompting investors to consider their risk tolerance and market expectations when making investment decisions.
See More
Trump Nominates Warsh as Fed Chair Amid Controversy
- Nomination Context: On April 25, 2025, Trump officially nominated former Fed governor Kevin Warsh to replace Jerome Powell as Fed Chair for a four-year term, reflecting Trump's desire to exert influence over Fed policy.
- Senate Resistance: Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina has stated he will block Warsh's nomination until the federal criminal investigation into Powell is resolved, potentially delaying the nomination process and affecting the stability of Fed leadership.
- Powell's Investigation: Powell is under investigation related to the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's headquarters, with threats of criminal charges stemming from his testimony, which could not only tarnish his reputation but also impact the Fed's policy decisions significantly.
- Trump-Fed Tensions: Trump's previous attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook, who supported Powell, illustrates his challenge to the Fed's independence, and the outcome of Cook's lawsuit could further influence the Fed's policy direction and internal power dynamics.
See More
Warsh's Fed Chair Nomination Has Been Submitted to the Senate: What's Next?
Nomination Announcement: The White House has officially nominated Kevin Warsh to be the chair of the Federal Reserve.
Senate Confirmation Process: His nomination has been sent to the Senate, initiating a confirmation process that may encounter significant challenges in committee.
See More
Billionaire Leo KoGuan Expands Nvidia Stake
- Nvidia Stake Increase: Billionaire Leo KoGuan purchased 1 million shares of Nvidia this week, expanding his investment in artificial intelligence and indicating his belief that AI investment is still in its early stages.
- Comparison with Tesla: KoGuan described Nvidia as the 'foundational layer' of AI, contrasting it with Tesla, which he views as 'physical AI,' highlighting his understanding of the distinct roles of both companies.
- Market Reaction Analysis: Despite Nvidia's recent quarterly report failing to boost its stock price, analysts remain bullish, noting that markets are focused on hyperscaler capital spending and venture funding levels, with Nvidia's valuation still attractive.
- Future Outlook: JPMorgan strategists noted that investors are seeking greater clarity on the 2027 data center growth outlook at the upcoming GTC conference, especially as major hyperscalers have significantly increased their capital expenditure budgets.
See More
Silver Prices Experience Fluctuations Amid Iran Conflict Disrupting Metals Markets
- Market Volatility: Precious metals prices have experienced significant volatility recently, influenced by various market factors.
- Safe-Haven Flows: Investors are reacting to safe-haven flows related to the U.S.-Iran conflict, impacting precious metals.
- Oil Prices and Inflation: A surge in oil prices is raising concerns about inflation pressures, which could affect the dollar and interest rate markets.
- Investor Uncertainty: The combination of geopolitical tensions and economic indicators is creating uncertainty for investors in the precious metals market.
See More
Comparison Analysis of iShares Bond ETFs
- Cost and Yield Comparison: The iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a slightly lower expense ratio of 0.14% compared to the iShares 20-Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 0.15%, while offering a dividend yield of 4.44%, which is marginally higher than TLT's 4.27%, making LQD more attractive for income-focused investors.
- Risk and Return Analysis: Over the past five years, LQD's maximum drawdown was 24.9%, significantly lower than TLT's 48.3%, indicating that LQD has demonstrated greater resilience during market volatility, appealing to investors seeking lower credit risk.
- Portfolio Composition: LQD holds over 3,071 securities, primarily concentrated in well-known issuers like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, ensuring diversity and stability in its portfolio, whereas TLT holds only 46 long-dated Treasury bonds, virtually eliminating credit risk.
- Interest Rate Sensitivity Consideration: Although LQD has outperformed TLT in the past five years, TLT's long-duration bond portfolio may perform better if interest rates decline, prompting investors to weigh LQD's higher yield against TLT's interest rate sensitivity to select the investment strategy that best fits their risk tolerance.
See More
Comparative Analysis of LQD and TLT Investments
- Cost and Yield Comparison: LQD charges a slightly lower annual expense ratio of 4.4% compared to TLT's 4.3%, while also offering a marginally higher yield, making it more appealing for income-focused investors despite the small difference.
- Portfolio Composition: LQD holds over 3,071 investment-grade corporate bonds, including major issuers like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs, whereas TLT only contains 46 long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, providing LQD with a diversification advantage in risk management.
- Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis: With an effective portfolio duration of 15.6 years, TLT is highly sensitive to interest rate changes, while LQD's average duration is just under 8 years, indicating lower volatility in rising rate environments.
- Market Performance and Risk Assessment: Although LQD has outperformed TLT over the past five years, TLT's long-duration bond portfolio could yield better results if interest rates decline, prompting investors to consider their risk tolerance and market expectations when making investment decisions.
See More
Trump Nominates Warsh as Fed Chair Amid Controversy
- Nomination Context: On April 25, 2025, Trump officially nominated former Fed governor Kevin Warsh to replace Jerome Powell as Fed Chair for a four-year term, reflecting Trump's desire to exert influence over Fed policy.
- Senate Resistance: Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina has stated he will block Warsh's nomination until the federal criminal investigation into Powell is resolved, potentially delaying the nomination process and affecting the stability of Fed leadership.
- Powell's Investigation: Powell is under investigation related to the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's headquarters, with threats of criminal charges stemming from his testimony, which could not only tarnish his reputation but also impact the Fed's policy decisions significantly.
- Trump-Fed Tensions: Trump's previous attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook, who supported Powell, illustrates his challenge to the Fed's independence, and the outcome of Cook's lawsuit could further influence the Fed's policy direction and internal power dynamics.
See More
Warsh's Fed Chair Nomination Has Been Submitted to the Senate: What's Next?
Nomination Announcement: The White House has officially nominated Kevin Warsh to be the chair of the Federal Reserve.
Senate Confirmation Process: His nomination has been sent to the Senate, initiating a confirmation process that may encounter significant challenges in committee.
See More
Billionaire Leo KoGuan Expands Nvidia Stake
- Nvidia Stake Increase: Billionaire Leo KoGuan purchased 1 million shares of Nvidia this week, expanding his investment in artificial intelligence and indicating his belief that AI investment is still in its early stages.
- Comparison with Tesla: KoGuan described Nvidia as the 'foundational layer' of AI, contrasting it with Tesla, which he views as 'physical AI,' highlighting his understanding of the distinct roles of both companies.
- Market Reaction Analysis: Despite Nvidia's recent quarterly report failing to boost its stock price, analysts remain bullish, noting that markets are focused on hyperscaler capital spending and venture funding levels, with Nvidia's valuation still attractive.
- Future Outlook: JPMorgan strategists noted that investors are seeking greater clarity on the 2027 data center growth outlook at the upcoming GTC conference, especially as major hyperscalers have significantly increased their capital expenditure budgets.
See More
Silver Prices Experience Fluctuations Amid Iran Conflict Disrupting Metals Markets
- Market Volatility: Precious metals prices have experienced significant volatility recently, influenced by various market factors.
- Safe-Haven Flows: Investors are reacting to safe-haven flows related to the U.S.-Iran conflict, impacting precious metals.
- Oil Prices and Inflation: A surge in oil prices is raising concerns about inflation pressures, which could affect the dollar and interest rate markets.
- Investor Uncertainty: The combination of geopolitical tensions and economic indicators is creating uncertainty for investors in the precious metals market.
See More
